Shore v. Diamond Tool & Abrasives Inc.

Filing 33

ORDER granting 31 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 8/1/2018. (EB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Jon Shore, Case No. 17-cv-4929 (DSD/TNL) Plaintiff, v. Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc., and Defendant/Cross Claimant, Gulf States Abrasives Manufacturing, LLC, Defendant/Cross Defendant/ Third-Party Plaintiff, v. DJC Holdings, LLC, and Prospect Foundry LLC, Third-Party Defendants. ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO BRING THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT WHEREAS, on July 31, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Leave to Bring Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 31), stating the purpose of which is to allow Defendant/Cross Claimant Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc. “to bring a direct claim . . . against [recently added Third-Party Defendants] DJC Holdings, LLC, and Prospect Foundry, LLC, the owner of the employer and facility, where Plaintiff was allegedly 1 injured, who trained and supervised the Plaintiff as well as owned and maintained the equipment being used at the time Plaintiff sustained injury”; and WHEREAS, on the same day, Defendant/Cross Claimant Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc., provided the Court with a copy of its proposed third-party complaint via e-mail; Having reviewed the proposed third-party complaint, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Leave to Bring Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED. Defendant/Cross Claimant Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc., shall serve and file a third-party summons and third-party complaint in substantially the same form as was provided to the Court within 10 days of the date of this Order. Date: August 1 , 2018 s/ Tony N. Leung Tony N. Leung United States Magistrate Judge District of Minnesota Shore v. Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc. et al. Case No. 17-cv-4929 (DSD/TNL) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?