Shore v. Diamond Tool & Abrasives Inc.
Filing
33
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 8/1/2018. (EB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jon Shore,
Case No. 17-cv-4929 (DSD/TNL)
Plaintiff,
v.
Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc., and
Defendant/Cross Claimant,
Gulf States Abrasives Manufacturing, LLC,
Defendant/Cross Defendant/
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
DJC Holdings, LLC, and
Prospect Foundry LLC,
Third-Party Defendants.
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO BRING
THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, on July 31, 2018, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation for Leave to
Bring Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 31), stating the purpose of which is to allow
Defendant/Cross Claimant Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc. “to bring a direct claim . . .
against [recently added Third-Party Defendants] DJC Holdings, LLC, and Prospect
Foundry, LLC, the owner of the employer and facility, where Plaintiff was allegedly
1
injured, who trained and supervised the Plaintiff as well as owned and maintained the
equipment being used at the time Plaintiff sustained injury”; and
WHEREAS, on the same day, Defendant/Cross Claimant Diamond Tool &
Abrasives, Inc., provided the Court with a copy of its proposed third-party complaint via
e-mail;
Having reviewed the proposed third-party complaint, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Leave to Bring Third-Party Complaint (ECF No. 31)
is GRANTED. Defendant/Cross Claimant Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc., shall serve
and file a third-party summons and third-party complaint in substantially the same form as
was provided to the Court within 10 days of the date of this Order.
Date: August
1
, 2018
s/ Tony N. Leung
Tony N. Leung
United States Magistrate Judge
District of Minnesota
Shore v. Diamond Tool & Abrasives, Inc.
et al.
Case No. 17-cv-4929 (DSD/TNL)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?