Mohamed v. Sessions et al
Filing
22
ORDER re 20 Letter to Request Permission to File Motion to Reconsider filed by Abdihakim Mohamed (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 12/12/2017. (DLO)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Civil No. 17-5331(DSD/BRT)
Abdihakim Mohamed
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III,
Attorney General; et al.
Respondents.
Kimberly K. Hunter, Esq., John R. Bruning, Esq. and Kim Hunter
Law, PLLC, 656 Selby Avenue, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55104,
counsel for petitioner.
Ann M. Bildtsen, United States Attorney’s Office, 300 South 4th
Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, counsel for
respondents.
This matter is before the court upon the request by petitioner
for permission to file a motion to reconsider the court’s December
5,
2017,
order
denying
restraining order.
petitioner’s
motion
for
a
temporary
See ECF No. 19.
Motions to reconsider require the express permission of the
court and will be granted only upon a showing of “compelling
circumstances.” D. Minn. LR 7.1(j). A motion to reconsider should
not be employed to relitigate old issues but rather to “afford an
opportunity for relief in extraordinary circumstances.”
Dale &
Selby Superette & Deli v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 838 F. Supp. 1346,
1348 (D. Minn. 1993).
correctly
concluded
The court is fully satisfied that it
that
it
did
not
have
jurisdiction
over
petitioner’s claim, and finds that compelling circumstances do not
exist to grant the request.
Accordingly,
IT
IS
HEREBY
ORDERED
that
the
request
for
permission to file a motion to reconsider [ECF No. 20] is denied.
Dated: December 12, 2017
s/David S. Doty
David S. Doty, Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?