United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sandberg et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting the United States Securities and Exchange Commissions Application for an Order Compelling Compliance with Administrative Subpoenas (Docket No. 1) (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/19/2018. (HAZ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
_____________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Miscellaneous No. 17-62 (JRT/TNL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
v.
COREY J. SANDBERG and AFFINITY
GOLD CORPORATION,
Defendant.
________________________________________________________________________
Charles J. Kerstetter, Bradley Neal Lewis, US SECURITIES &
EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 175 Jackson Boulevard West, Suite 900,
Chicago, IL 60604-2615, for plaintiff.
Corey J. Sandberg, pro se defendant.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate
Judge Tony N. Leung dated February 1, 2018 (Docket No. 13), along with all the
files and records, and no objections to said Recommendation having been filed, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission’s
Application
for
an
Order
Compelling
Compliance
with
Administrative Subpoenas, (Docket No. 1), is GRANTED as follows:
1. Respondent Corey J. Sandberg shall comply with the March 13, 2017
subpoena by producing all documents responsive thereto no later than
February 28, 2018.
2. Respondent Affinity Gold Corporation shall comply with the March 13,
2017 subpoena and July 7, 2017 subpoena by producing all documents
responsive thereto no later than February 28, 2018.
Dated: February 19, 2018
at Minneapolis, Minnesota
s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
Chief Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?