United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sandberg et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting the United States Securities and Exchange Commissions Application for an Order Compelling Compliance with Administrative Subpoenas (Docket No. 1) (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/19/2018. (HAZ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA _____________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Miscellaneous No. 17-62 (JRT/TNL) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. COREY J. SANDBERG and AFFINITY GOLD CORPORATION, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ Charles J. Kerstetter, Bradley Neal Lewis, US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 175 Jackson Boulevard West, Suite 900, Chicago, IL 60604-2615, for plaintiff. Corey J. Sandberg, pro se defendant. Based upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated February 1, 2018 (Docket No. 13), along with all the files and records, and no objections to said Recommendation having been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s Application for an Order Compelling Compliance with Administrative Subpoenas, (Docket No. 1), is GRANTED as follows: 1. Respondent Corey J. Sandberg shall comply with the March 13, 2017 subpoena by producing all documents responsive thereto no later than February 28, 2018. 2. Respondent Affinity Gold Corporation shall comply with the March 13, 2017 subpoena and July 7, 2017 subpoena by producing all documents responsive thereto no later than February 28, 2018. Dated: February 19, 2018 at Minneapolis, Minnesota s/John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM Chief Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?