Brown v. Cooper et al

Filing 144

ORDER granting 63 Motion to Dismiss/General; granting 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 82 Motion to Dismiss/General; granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 142 Report and Recommendation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 1/7/2019. (DLO)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No.: 18-219 (DSD/BRT) James N. Brown, Jr., Plaintiff, v. ORDER Associate Warden G. Cooper; Ken Hyle, Asst. Director; Sara Revell, Regional Director; Kathleen Kenney, Gen. Counsel; L. LaRiva, Warden; L. Janssen, R.N.; C. Orum, Unit Manager; R. Woltman, Unit Counselor; FNU Sanson; A. Cossette, Unit Manager; D. Holbus, Lieutenant; C. Stromberg; FNU Hare; Peter Arroyo; Charles Slater, MD; Sheila Hadaway, MD; Misbah Baqir, MBBS; Mayo Clinic; M. Porter, R.N., Supervisor; T. Miller, Captain; and the United States of America, Defendants. This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge Becky Thorson, dated December 11, 2018. The magistrate judge recommended that the court grant defendants’ summary judgment motions.1 No objections to the R&R have been filed within the time period permitted. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b)(1). Under these circumstances, the court finds it appropriate to adopt the R&R. 1 The motions were filed as motions to dismiss, however, the magistrate judge converted them into summary judgment motions because the parties presented, and the court considered, evidence outside the pleadings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R [ECF No. 142] is adopted in its entirety; 2. The motions for summary judgment [ECF Nos. 63, 82] are granted; 3. The action is dismissed with prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 7, 2019 s/David S. Doty David S. Doty, Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?