Leventhal v. Tomford et al
Filing
72
ORDER denying 70 Motion for extension of time to file response; motion for permission to file early summary judgment motion.(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 10/3/2018. (LCC) cc: Howard E. Leventhal. Modified text on 10/3/2018 (MMP).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Howard E. Leventhal.,
Case No. 0:18-cv-320-PAM-KMM
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
Travis Tomford et al.;
Defendants.
Howard E. Leventhal, # 46376-424, Federal Prison Camp, P.O. Box 1000, Duluth,
MN 55814, pro se.
Mr. Leventhal has filed a motion (ECF No. 70) requesting an extension until
October 5th to respond to the government’s motion to reconsider this Court’s order
granting Mr. Leventhal permission to file in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 58) This motion
is denied because Mr. Leventhal already has until October 11th to respond to the
government’s motion. The government’s motion was filed on September 20, 2018 (see
ECF No. 58), and Mr. Leventhal was granted 21 days to respond. (See Order
Granting Request for Permission to File a Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 50.)
Therefore, Mr. Leventhal’s request is moot.
Within the same motion, Mr. Leventhal requested permission to file an early
summary judgment motion. The Court finds that summary judgment motions would
be premature at this stage of the litigation and denies Mr. Leventhal’s request at this
time. Because the Court denies this request, it also denies Mr. Leventhal’s request for
a telephonic hearing on the matter.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Mr. Leventhal’s Motion for Time to File Objections to Defendants’ Doc. 58,
59, & 60; to File Motion for Summary Judgment, and for Telephonic Hearing
in this Matter (ECF No. 70) is DENIED.
Date: October 3, 2018
s/ Katherine Menendez
Katherine Menendez
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?