Deoleo S.A. et al v. InnoVision Health Media, Inc.
Filing
29
ORDER on 28 Stipulation, CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Carapelli Firenze S.P.A., Deoleo S.A., Deoleo, USA, Inc. against InnoVision Health Media, Inc., and PERMANENT INJUNCTION. (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 11/15/2018. (JRE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Deoleo S.A., Deoleo, USA, Inc., and
Carapelli Firenze S.P.A.,
Case No. 18-cv-422 (TNL)
Plaintiffs,
v.
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
InnoVision Health Media, Inc.
d/b/a Natural Solutions Magazine,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Entry of Consent
Judgment and Permanent Injunction. (ECF No. 28). Based on the stipulation of the parties,
and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this case and jurisdiction
over Defendant.
2.
Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
3.
Defendant InnoVision Health Media, Inc. owns and operates the Natural
Solutions Magazine Facebook page, and on that page it posted on February 11, 2017 a link
to an article published on organichealthcorner.com entitled, “The 14 Fake Olive Oil
Companies Are Revealed Now – Avoid These Brands,” and on July 20, 2017, a link to a
video shared by the page “Make Your Life Healthier” (collectively the “Fake Oil Media”).
4.
InnoVision subsequently learned that the Fake Oil Media that it posted was
false and misleading, including insofar as they suggested that any of the Deoleo brands
1
offered or offer olive oil that is adulterated, “cut,” or “fake” in any way (the “False
Statements”).
5.
InnoVision then ceased publication of the Fake Oil Media, and does not
intend to repost or republish the Fake Oil Media or any stories containing the False
Statements.
6.
InnoVision stipulates that it received no compensation, directly or indirectly,
as a result of its posting the Fake Oil Media from any trade organization, manufacturer, or
other entity affiliated with the production or sale of olive oil.
7.
InnoVision stipulates that it is not aware of any connection between the
entities that provided the Fake Oil Media to InnoVision and any trade organization,
manufacturer, or other entity affiliated with the production or sale of olive oil.
8.
InnoVision stipulates that, other than the Fake Oil Media, it is not aware of
having ever published the False Statements.
9.
Defendant, together with all of Defendant’s officers, agents, servants,
employees, representatives, and assigns, and all other persons, firms, or companies in
active concert or participation with Defendant are permanently enjoined and restrained
from directly or indirectly publishing the Fake Oil Media, as well as any material that
falsely or misleadingly suggests that any of the products offered by Deoleo, or any of its
affiliates, is adulterated, “cut,” or “fake” in any way.
10.
This Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction shall be binding upon and
shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors, assigns, and acquiring
companies.
2
11.
If Defendant is found by the Court to be in contempt of, or otherwise to have
violated this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction, the parties agree that Plaintiff
shall be entitled to all available relief which it may otherwise request from the Court,
including sanctions for contempt, damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, costs, and any
other relief deemed proper in the event of such violation.
12.
The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the
terms of this Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction.
13.
The permanent injunction shall remain in full force and effect unless and until
modified by order of this court.
14.
This matter is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Date: November 15, 2018
s/ Tony N. Leung
Tony N. Leung
United States Magistrate Judge
District of Minnesota
Deleo S.A., et al. v. InnoVision Health
Media, Inc.
No. 18-cv-422 (TNL)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?