Jackson v. Barnes

Filing 15

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 12 Report and Recommendation.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 10/22/2018. (DLO)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Civil No.: 18-1392(DSD/ECW)
Deborah Jackson,
Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

Warden Barnes,
Respondent.
This matter is before the court upon the objection by pro se
petitioner Deborah Jackson to the October 1, 2018, report and
recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright.

The

court reviews the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge
de novo.

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3);

D. Minn. LR 72.2(b).
The background of this case is fully set forth in the report
and recommendation, and the court will not repeat it here. Jackson
objects to the magistrate judge’s recommendation that her petition
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should be dismissed without prejudice for
lack of jurisdiction.

In doing so, Jackson raises the same

arguments made before the magistrate judge.

After a thorough

review of the file and record, the court finds that the report and
recommendation is well-reasoned and correct and that the objection
lacks merit.

Accordingly, based on the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

Petitioner’s objection [ECF No. 13] to the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation is overruled;
2.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No.

12] is adopted in its entirety;
3.

Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF

No. 1] is denied; and
4.

This matter is dismissed without prejudice for lack of

jurisdiction.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 22, 2018
s/David S. Doty
David S. Doty, Judge
United States District Court

2