Ontiveros v. Ontiveros

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 09/21/2018. (TJB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Tito Freddy Ontiveros, Case No. 18-cv-1916 (WMW/KMM) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. Tito Freddy Ontiveros, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the August 17, 2018 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Dkt. 8.) The R&R recommends dismissing Plaintiff Tito Freddy Ontiveros’s case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Objections to the R&R have not been filed in the time period permitted. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 amendment (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The August 17, 2018 R&R, (Dkt. 8), is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff Tito Freddy Ontiveros’s case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: September 21, 2018 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?