Diomande v. Secretary Homeland Security et al
ORDER.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The September 16, 2019 R&R 15 is ADOPTED. Petitioner Mohamed D.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, 1 is DENIED AS MOOT. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 10/8/2019. (RJE)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case No. 19-cv-0325 (WMW/TNL)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Secretary Homeland Security, William P.
Barr, Peter Berg, and Kurt Freitag,
This matter is before the Court on the September 16, 2019 Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Dkt. 15.)
The R&R recommends denying as moot Petitioner Mohamed D.’s petition for a writ of
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which he seeks release from the custody of the
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). No objection to the R&R was filed
in the time period permitted.
In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (“When no timely objection is filed, the
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to
accept the recommendation.”); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per
curiam). Having conducted a careful review, the Court finds no clear error as to the R&R’s
conclusion that the petition became moot upon Petitioner’s release from ICE custody on
May 3, 2019.
Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R and denies the petition as moot.
Based on the R&R, the foregoing analysis, and all of the files, records, and
proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
The September 16, 2019 R&R, (Dkt. 15), is ADOPTED.
Petitioner Mohamed D.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241, (Dkt. 1), is DENIED AS MOOT.
This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 8, 2019
s/Wilhelmina M. Wright
Wilhelmina M. Wright
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?