Picha et al v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #9 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Process of Removal, to Strike, Overrule, and Deny Defendants' Motion to Remove and to Remand to the State to Proceed Regarding Substantive and Common Law Jural Rights Protections #6 is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/9/2019. (GRR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Ryan Picha and Kristy Picha, Case No. 19-cv-2240 (MJD/DTS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated September 10, 2019 [Doc. No. 9] recommending that Plaintiffs’ motion to Quash Process of Removal, to Strike, Overrule, and Deny Defendants’ Motion to Remove and to Remand to the State to Proceed Regarding Substantive and Common Law Jural Rights Protections [Doc. No. 6] be denied. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court will ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Process of Removal, to Strike, Overrule, and Deny Defendants’ Motion to Remove and to Remand to the State to Proceed Regarding Substantive and Common Law Jural Rights Protections [Docket No. 6] is DENIED. Dated: October 9, 2019 s/ Michael J. Davis Michael J. Davis United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?