Jenni v. Goldstein et al
Filing
4
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation 3 is ACCEPTED. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs 2 is DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 1/6/2021.(RMM)
CASE 0:20-cv-02107-ECT-LIB Doc. 4 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mark Jenni,
File No. 20-cv-2107 (ECT/LIB)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Justin Goldstein and Able Roofing, LLC,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois issued a Report and Recommendation on
December 14, 2020.
ECF No. 3.
No party has objected to that Report and
Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b);
Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error,
and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT
IS ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ACCEPTED;
2.
The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction; and
3.
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees
or Costs [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 5, 2021
s/ Eric C. Tostrud
Eric C. Tostrud
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?