Cassady v. Saul
Filing
41
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Joseph Alan Cassady's motion for attorneys' fees 35 is GRANTED as provided in the parties' January 18, 2022 Stipulation. 2. Plaintiff Joseph Alan Cassady is awarded $7,500.00 in attorneys' fees and $500 in expenses under the EAJA, which shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the parties' Stipulation. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 5/9/2022. (RJE)
CASE 0:20-cv-02246-WMW-JFD Doc. 41 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Joseph Alan Cassady,
Case No. 20-cv-2246 (WMW/JFD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Joseph Alan Cassady’s motion for an
award of attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). (Dkt. 35.)
Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), does
not oppose Cassady’s motion. Instead, on January 18, 2022, the parties filed a joint
stipulated agreement (Stipulation) to the payment of attorneys’ fees under the EAJA.
Under the EAJA, a court must award to a prevailing party “fees and other
expenses . . . incurred by that party in any civil action,” including proceedings seeking
judicial review of agency action brought against the United States, “unless the court finds
that the position of the United States was substantially justified or that special
circumstances make an award unjust.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Here, it is undisputed
that Cassady is the prevailing party in this civil action seeking judicial review of a final
administrative determination of the Social Security Administration. And the parties
stipulate that Cassady should be awarded $7,500 in attorneys’ fees and $500 in expenses
CASE 0:20-cv-02246-WMW-JFD Doc. 41 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 2
under the EAJA to compensate Cassady for all legal services rendered on behalf of Cassady
in connection with this lawsuit. Because there is no basis for the Court to find that the
Commissioner’s position was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an
award of attorneys’ fees and expenses unjust, Cassady’s motion is granted consistent with
the parties’ Stipulation.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff Joseph Alan Cassady’s motion for attorneys’ fees, (Dkt. 35), is
GRANTED as provided in the parties’ January 18, 2022 Stipulation.
2.
Plaintiff Joseph Alan Cassady is awarded $7,500.00 in attorneys’ fees and
$500 in expenses under the EAJA, which shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the
parties’ Stipulation.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: May 9, 2022
s/Wilhelmina M. Wright
Wilhelmina M. Wright
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?