Haman v. Beltrami County et al

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 26 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Andrew Joseph Haman. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 4/28/2021.(HMA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ANDREW JOSEPH HAMAN, PLAINTIFF, V. BELTRAMI COUNTY, et al., Civil No. 20-2277 (JRT/HB) ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DEFENDANTS. Andrew Joseph Haman, OID 259753, MCF-Moose Lake, 1000 Lake Shore Drive, Moose Lake, MN 55767, pro se plaintiff. Jason M Hiveley, Andrew Wolf, IVERSON REUVERS CONDON, 9321 Ensign Avenue South, Bloomington, MN 55438, for defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer entered a Report and Recommendation on April 8, 2021. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Andrew Joseph Haman’s Motion to Remand to State Court and to Compel Defendants to Produce Documents [ECF No. 26] is GRANTED as to remand and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to compelling the production of documents; 2. This case is REMANDED to the District Court of the State of Minnesota, County of Beltrami, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Memorandum [ECF No. 38] is DENIED; and 4. No costs or expenses are awarded to either side. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: April 28, 2021 in Minneapolis, Minnesota s/John R. Tunheim JOHN R. TUNHEIM Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?