Haman v. Beltrami County et al
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 26 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Andrew Joseph Haman. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 4/28/2021.(HMA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
ANDREW JOSEPH HAMAN,
PLAINTIFF,
V.
BELTRAMI COUNTY, et al.,
Civil No. 20-2277 (JRT/HB)
ORDER ON REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
DEFENDANTS.
Andrew Joseph Haman, OID 259753, MCF-Moose Lake, 1000 Lake Shore
Drive, Moose Lake, MN 55767, pro se plaintiff.
Jason M Hiveley, Andrew Wolf, IVERSON REUVERS CONDON, 9321 Ensign
Avenue South, Bloomington, MN 55438, for defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer entered a Report and
Recommendation on April 8, 2021. No objections have been filed to the Report and
Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the
files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff Andrew Joseph Haman’s Motion to Remand to State Court and to
Compel Defendants to Produce Documents [ECF No. 26] is GRANTED as to
remand and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to compelling the production of
documents;
2. This case is REMANDED to the District Court of the State of Minnesota, County of
Beltrami, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;
3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Memorandum [ECF No. 38]
is DENIED; and
4. No costs or expenses are awarded to either side.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: April 28, 2021
in Minneapolis, Minnesota
s/John R. Tunheim
JOHN R. TUNHEIM
Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?