Graham v. U.S. Marshal et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 8 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Petitioner William Charles Graham's amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 4 is DENIED. 2. Petitioner's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs 7 is DENIED as moot. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/28/2021.(GRR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

William Charles Graham,

Case No. 21-cv-246 (MJD/DTS)

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

U.S. Marshal, et al.,
Respondents.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by
United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated April 2, 2021. [Doc. No.
8] Petitioner has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the
record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, and in
consideration of the applicable law, the Court will adopt the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.

Petitioner William Charles Graham’s amended Petition for a Writ of

Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 4] is DENIED.

2.

Petitioner’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without

Prepaying Fees or Costs [Doc. No. 7] is DENIED as moot.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: April 28, 2021

s/Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
United States District Court

2