Craft v. Birkholz

Filing 15

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation 14 is ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED; and 3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/18/2023.(GRR)

CASE 0:21-cv-01917-MJD-JFD Doc. 15 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CHARLES CRAFT,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER
Criminal File No. 21-CV-1917 (MJD/JFD)

WARDEN B. BIRKHOLZ,
Defendant.

Petitioner Charles Craft is pro se.
Ana H. Voss, Ann M. Bildsten, Assistant United States Attorneys, Counsel for
Respondent.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty dated October 20, 2022. (Doc.
14.) No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed in the
time period permitted by the Local Rules.
Accordingly, based on the foregoing and the files, records, and
proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is ADOPTED;
1

CASE 0:21-cv-01917-MJD-JFD Doc. 15 Filed 01/18/23 Page 2 of 2

2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED; and
3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: January 18, 2023

s/Michael J. Davis
Michael J. Davis
United States District Court

2