Hussein v. Garland et al

Filing 8

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Gamada A. Hussein's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 5 is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff Gamada A. Hussein's motion to expedite consideration of his in forma pauperis application 6 is DENIED AS MOOT. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 12/3/2021. (RJE)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Gamada A. Hussein,

Case No. 21-mc-0064 (WMW)
Plaintiff,
ORDER

v.
Merrick Garland et al.,
Defendants.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Gamada A. Hussein’s application to proceed in forma
pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the Court’s denial of authorization to proceed in this
matter. 1 (Dkt. 5.) In denying Hussein’s request for authorization, this Court expressly
found that an appeal of the denial could not be taken in good faith and that any request to
proceed IFP on appeal would be denied accordingly. The Court remains satisfied that
this is true and denies Hussein’s appellate IFP application on that basis. Hussein’s
pending motion to expedite consideration of the IFP application is denied as moot.
Based on the foregoing analysis and all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.

Plaintiff Gamada A. Hussein’s application to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal, (Dkt. 5), is DENIED.

1

Due to prior vexatious conduct, Hussein is restricted from filing new cases in this
District unless he is represented by counsel or receives advance authorization to proceed
from a judicial officer of this District. See Gamada v. Whitaker, No. 19-cv-0292
(JRT/HB), Dkt. 37 (D. Minn. Sept. 18, 2019).

2.

Plaintiff Gamada A. Hussein’s motion to expedite consideration of his in

forma pauperis application, (Dkt. 6), is DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated: December 3, 2021

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright
Wilhelmina M. Wright
United States District Judge

2