Craft v. Eischen

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as duplicative. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 1/18/2023.(JCM)

Download PDF
CASE 0:22-cv-02032-KMM-JFD Doc. 9 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Charles Craft, Petitioner, v. Case No. 22-CV-2032 (KMM/JFD) ORDER Warden Eischen, FPC, Duluth, Defendant. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, dated October 25, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted. The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as duplicative. CASE 0:22-cv-02032-KMM-JFD Doc. 9 Filed 01/18/23 Page 2 of 2 Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly. Date: January 18, 2023 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?