Craft v. Eischen
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as duplicative. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 1/18/2023.(JCM)
CASE 0:22-cv-02032-KMM-JFD Doc. 9 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Charles Craft,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 22-CV-2032 (KMM/JFD)
ORDER
Warden Eischen, FPC, Duluth,
Defendant.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and
Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, dated
October 25, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period
permitted.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific
objections are made. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of
objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.
Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon,
73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of
the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear
or otherwise.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as duplicative.
CASE 0:22-cv-02032-KMM-JFD Doc. 9 Filed 01/18/23 Page 2 of 2
Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly.
Date: January 18, 2023
s/ Katherine M. Menendez
Katherine M. Menendez
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?