Spigelman v. Langseth
Filing
40
ORDER denying 39 Motion to Reopen Case (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 1/2/2025. (MGMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Joel Spigelman,
Civ. No. 23-2092 (PAM/LIB)
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
Warden Rardin; Gabriel Langseth, Rehab
Services; Herzog, Nurse; Peggy Moore,
P.A.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Joel Spigelman’s Motion to Reopen. In
January 2024, after Spigelman failed to secure summonses to effect service on Defendants,
United States Magistrate Judge Leo Brisbois ordered Spigelman to show cause why his
lawsuit should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Docket No. 12.) The Court
allowed Spigelman additional time to serve Defendants, but he did not do so; thus, the
Court dismissed the case without prejudice in June 2024. (Docket Nos. 19, 22.) In August
2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed that decision.
(Docket No. 31.)
Spigelman contends that the matter should be reopened because he has identified
someone who is able to serve process on Defendants. (Docket No. 39.) The Court has
limited authority to reopen a case after final judgment has been entered. Although
Spigelman does not specify the legal authority for his Motion, Rule 60(b) provides the
grounds on which a court “may relieve a party . . . from a final judgment, order, or
proceeding.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). The Rule sets forth specific reasons for such relief,
including a mistake, the discovery of new evidence that could not have been discovered
previously, or fraud, among other reasons. Id. Rule 60 does not provide the legal basis for
the relief Spigelman seeks. Moreover, the Court allowed Spiegelman ample time to serve
Defendants in the first instance. Spigelman’s claims were dismissed without prejudice,
thus he may file a new case if he so wishes. (See Docket No. 22 at 2.)
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Spigelman’s Motion to Reopen
(Docket No. 39) is DENIED.
Dated: January 2, 2025
s/ Paul A. Magnuson
Paul A. Magnuson
United States District Court Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?