Heurung v. Rardin
Filing
19
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 18 . (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 11/25/2024. (MGMM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Johnny Frederic Heurung,
Civ. No. 23-3749 (PAM/LIB)
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
Jared Rardin, Warden,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of
United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated October 17, 2024. (Docket No. 18.)
The R&R recommends dismissal of this matter with prejudice because Petitioner Johnny
Frederic Heurung is not entitled to relief on his claims. Petitioner did not file any objections
to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b)(1).
This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections
are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793,
795 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for
clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the
Magistrate Judge’s reasoning.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The R&R (Docket No. 18) is ADOPTED;
2.
Petitioner’s Amended Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Docket No. 6) is
DENIED; and
3.
This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
s/ Paul A. Magnuson
Date: November 25, 2024
Paul A. Magnuson
United States District Court Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?