Hudson v. Banks et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Finding as MOOT 28 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Carlton Hudson, Finding as MOOT 30 Motion to Compel filed by Carlton Hudson. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Michael P. Mills on 10/23/08. (lpm, USDC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION CARLTON HUDSON, V. JACQUELYN BANKS, et al., PETITIONER NO. 1:07CV0013-M-D RESPONDENTS ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS and ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner, an inmate proceeding pro se, files this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On June 2, 2008, Magistrate Judge Jerry A. Davis recommended that this matter be dismissed with prejudice. On September 15, 2008, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court finds that Petitioner's arguments are not well-taken and that the objections should be overruled for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the court approves and adopts as its opinion. THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that (1) Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are OVERRULED; (2) the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of this court; (3) the claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) Petitioner's motion for time (docket entry 28) is MOOT; (5) Petitioner's motion to compel (docket entry 30) is MOOT; and (6) this matter is CLOSED. SO ORDERED, this the 23rd day of October, 2008. /s/ MICHAEL P. MILLS CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?