Chandler v. Epps et al

Filing 21

ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendations and overruling objections. This case is hereby STAYED for 90 days for the Petitioner to pursue relief in state court. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 10/22/2008. (psk, USDC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION JOEY MONTRELL CHANDLER, V. CHRISTOPHER EPPS, et al., PETITIONER NO. 1:08CV093-A-D RESPONDENTS ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS and ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner, an inmate proceeding pro se, files this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 12, 2008, Magistrate Judge Jerry A. Davis recommended that this matter be stayed for a period of ninety days to allow Petitioner to exhaust his claims in state court in accordance with the AEDPA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1). On October 2, 2008, Respondents filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court finds that Respondents' arguments are not well-taken and that the objections should be overruled for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the court approves and adopts as its opinion. THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that 1) Respondents' objections to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are OVERRULED; 2) the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of this court; 3) this matter is STAYED for ninety days, during which time Petitioner should promptly pursue relief in state court; 4) at the expiration of ninety days, which will be approximately January 21, 2009, Petitioner shall notify the court in writing of his filings in state court and the disposition of those matters; and 5) Petitioner is cautioned that failure to actively pursue relief in state court and timely advise this court may result in dismissal of his federal habeas petition. SO ORDERED, this the 22nd day of October, 2008. /s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?