St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company v. Cordova Constructors MS, LLC et al

Filing 46

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 5/7/15. (rel) (Main Document 46 replaced on 5/7/2015) (rel).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-cv-00056-GHD-DAS CORDOVA CONSTRUCTORS MS, LLC; CORDOVA CONSTRUCTORS, INC.; LARRY PATTERSON; and LYNN PATTERSON DEFENDANTS ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On consideration of the file and records in this action, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation [45] of the United States Magistrate Judge dated April 17, 2015 was on that date duly served upon Plaintiffs counsel and counsel of record for Defendants; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of said Report and Recommendation; and that no objection thereto has been filed or served by any party. The Court is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1) the Report and Recommendation [45] of the United States Magistrate Judge dated April 17, 2015 is hereby approved and adopted as the opinion ofthe Court; 2) Plaintiff s second motion to enforce the settlement agreement [41] is GRANTED; 3) Defendants are required to execute the settlement documents attached to the Report and Recommendation [45] as Addenda 2; 4) Plaintiff shall be awarded its attorney's fees and other expenses incurred in the filing and prosecution of both motions to enforce the settlement agreement [31 & 41]; 5) Plaintiff s first motion to enforce the settlement agreement [31] is MOOT; and 6) The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is SO ORDERED, this, the 7 ~ d.y ofM.y, 2015. ) ,dL ;I SJce-...Lt...­ SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?