Montgomery v. W.C.C.R.C.F., et al

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 36 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 12/26/2013. (dlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION STANLEY MONTGOMERY vs. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:12CV73-SA-SAA TIM PALMER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Upon consideration of the file and records in this action, including the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated September 6, 2013, and the September 12, 2013, response thereto, the Court finds as follows: The plaintiff’s response to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation fails to challenge the Magistrate Judge’s findings of fact or conclusions of law. Rather, in his response, the plaintiff complains that the Winston-Choctaw County Regional Correctional Facility refuses to provide him with legal postage, which he needs to mail two complaints to the Court for filing. If the plaintiff wishes to pursue a claim that his right to access the courts is being denied by prison officials, he will need to do so in a separate § 1983 suit. His objections, such as they are, are without merit to the instant action, and the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED: 1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated September 6, 2013, is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. That the instant case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice for the plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 1 3. That this case is CLOSED. 4. That a final judgment consistent with this Order will enter today. THIS, the 26th day of September, 2013. /s/ Sharion Aycock U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?