Evans v. Oktibbeha County, Mississippi et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM OPINION re 11 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/29/2013. (psk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION ELIZABETH R. EVANS V. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12CV247-SA-SAA OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, GLENN HAMILTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CIRCUIT CLERK OF OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, MARVEL HOWARD, DANIEL JACKSON, JOHN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO K. TRAINER, and JOE WILLIAMS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants Oktibbeha County, Glenn Hamilton, Marvel Howard, Daniel Jackson, John Montgomery, Orlando Trainer, and Joe Williams jointly filed a Motion to Dismiss [4] for lack of personal jurisdiction due to insufficient process and insufficient service of process. After reviewing the motion, response, rules and authorities, the Court makes the following findings: Plaintiff Elizabeth Evans filed this suit against Defendants on July 5, 2012. Hamilton is the circuit clerk of Oktibbeha County; Howard, Jackson, Montgomery, and Williams serve on the Board of Supervisors of Oktibbeha County (“Board”); and Trainer is the president of the Board. On November 5, 2012, exactly 123 days after the suit was filed, Evans served summonses on Defendants in this manner: (1) on Oktibbeha County by stating service upon Hamilton as the county’s agent, but actually delivering summons to the County Administrator Don Posey; (2) on Howard, Jackson, Montgomery, Williams, and Trainer by delivering summonses again to Don Posey; and (3) on Hamilton no service was or has been made to this date. The fact that Evans did not serve summonses within the 120 day statutory deadline of Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is alone sufficient grounds to dismiss this case as to Oktibbeha County and all of the members of the Board in their individual and official capacities. The dismissal of this case, however, is further warranted by a plethora of defects in service. The service of summons on Oktibbeha County fails also because it was not made on the statutorily designated agent. Service upon a county in Mississippi shall be made by “delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the president or clerk of the board of supervisors.” Miss. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(6). Neither Posey nor Hamilton are the president or clerk of the Board. Next, the service of summons on each of the members of the Board being delivered to Posey is insufficient. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) and Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(1), Evans could have completed service of process upon each member of the Board either by personal delivery to each member or his agent or by leaving a copy at each individual’s place of abode with a suitable adult. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [4] is GRANTED and this case as to: 1. Oktibbeha County is DISMISSED for untimely and constitutionally insufficient service of process; 2. Howard, Jackson, Montgomery, Trainer, and Williams is DISMISSED with respect to both their individual and official capacities for untimely and constitutionally insufficient service of process; and 3. Hamilton is DISMISSED for failure to serve process. This case is hereby DISMISSED. SO ORDERED this the 29th day of July, 2013. /s/ Sharion Aycock________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?