Hawn v. Hughes et al

Filing 112

ORDER denying 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 9/8/14. (rel)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION JOHN A. HAWN, BRYAN LINDSEY, HEATHER SEAWRIGHT, RONNIE HORTON, and MATILDA MOORE v. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:13-cv-00036-GHD-DAS CHRISTOPHER (e.G.) HUGHES and MICHAEL BERTHAY, in their individual capacities DEFENDANTS ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT MICHAEL BERTHAY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to an opinion issued this day, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Michael Berthay's motion for summary judgment [85] is DENIED. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Christopher (C.G.) Hughes and Michael Berthay, in their individual capacities, remain viable, and Defendants Christopher (C.G.) Hughes and Michael Berthay remain parties in the action. All memoranda, depositions, declarations, and other materials considered by the Court in ruling on this motion are hereby incorporat~into and made a part ofthe record in this action. dPIt is SO ORDERED, this, the_{}_day of September, 2014. SENIOR JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?