Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Worsham et al
Filing
10
ORDER granting 4 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 4/14/2014. (bkl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
V.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-00247-SA-DAS
JERRY WAYNE WORSHAM, JR.,
AMY WORSHAM, SOONER TRUSTEE SERVICE,
1513 STATE PARK ROAD TRUST,
ANY AND ALL PERSONS WITH AN INTEREST IN
THE REAL PROPERTY BEARING THE MUNICIPAL
ADDRESS OF 1513 STATE PARK ROAD,
MOOREVILLE, MISSISSIPPI
DEFENDANTS
ORDER REMANDING CASE
Pursuant to a Memorandum Opinion issued this day, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [4] is
GRANTED. The Court finds removal of this matter is not available on the basis of diversity
jurisdiction. Further, Defendants Jerry and Amy Worsham had no objectively reasonable basis
for removing this matter, and therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to just costs and actual expenses,
including attorney fees, incurred as a result of removal.
This matter is hereby REMANDED to the Chancery Court of Lee County, Mississippi.
Additionally, Plaintiff’s request for costs and expenses is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the
appropriate documentation with this Court no later than April 21, 2014, containing an itemized
accounting of its just costs and actual expenses, including attorney fees, incurred as a result of
the removal of this action. Because the Worshams are proceeding pro se, they shall have until
May 5, 2014 to file any objections as to specific itemized costs or amounts requested. If Plaintiff
fails to file its documentation within the time allotted, its request for just costs and actual
expenses, including attorney fees, will be deemed waived.
SO ORDERED on this, the 14th day of April, 2014.
_/s/ Sharion Aycock_________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?