Boone v. Acadian Wood Products, Inc.
Filing
18
AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 9/12/2014. (bkl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
SUDIE E. BOONE
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:14CV089-SA-DAS
ACADIAN WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
DEFENDANT
AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
UPON motion ore tenus of the parties for a dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims
asserted by Plaintiff, Sudie E. Boone, against Defendant, Acadian Wood Products, Inc. in the
above-referenced matter and the Court, being advised that the parties have reached a settlement
and now request that the case now be dismissed with prejudice, finds that said motion is well
taken and should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that any and all claims of the
Plaintiff, Sudie E. Boone, brought, or which could have been brought, against the Defendant,
Acadian Wood Products, Inc., in the above-referenced matter shall be and are hereby dismissed
with prejudice with each party to bear their own costs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the terms and conditions of any
and all releases and/or settlement agreements signed by the Plaintiff, are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth herein and the Court acknowledges that this judgment of dismissal
is being entered as a condition of the settlement between the parties and the Court retains
jurisdiction over the enforcement, if any, of the settlement agreements with each party bearing
their own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 12th day of September, 2014.
_/s/ Sharion Aycock__________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
AGREED:
/s/ R. Gregg Rogers
R. GREGG ROGERS, ESQ., MSB #5651
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Reagan D. Wise
REAGAN D. WISE, MSB # 100309
Attorney for Defendant
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?