Blue v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

ORDER granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Allan Alexander on 05/06/16. (sd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION JANICE LAURIE BLUE PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:15-CV-129-SAA COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT ORDER GRANTING PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY’S FEES Plaintiff seeks an award for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Docket 17. Plaintiff obtained judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying a claim for benefits, and by judgment dated April 12, 2016, this court remanded the case to the Commissioner for the sole purpose of determining the amount of benefits to be awarded to plaintiff. Docket 16. Contending she was the prevailing party, and the Commissioner’s position was not “substantially justified,” plaintiff now seeks fees totaling $4,672.50, which represents 26.7 hours of work at a rate of $175.00 per hour. Docket 17, p. 2. The Commissioner does not object to the requested award of reasonable attorney fees in this case under the EAJA, but does request that any award under EAJA should be paid directly to the plaintiff under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). Docket 18. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the record and the applicable law, the court finds the award of attorney’s fees should be GRANTED. Plaintiff is entitled to the reasonable attorney’s fees submitted. It is ORDERED 1 that plaintiff is awarded $4,672.50 in attorney fees to be paid directly to plaintiff. Defendant will mail the award to plaintiff’s attorney in plaintiff’s name. This the 6th day of May, 2016. /s/ S. Allan Alexander UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?