Rice v. Tohan et al
Filing
92
AGREED ORDER dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/5/2017. (dbm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
CHARLENE D. RICE
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CAUSE NO. 1:15-CV-00182-SA-DAS
A & S TRANSPORTATION, INC.
DEFENDANT
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
UPON motion ore tenus of the parties for a dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted against
Defendants, A & S Transportation, Inc., and Jose Tohan, a/k/a Jose J. Toban Hernandez, in the above-referenced
matter and the Court, being advised that the parties have reached a settlement and now request that the case now be
dismissed with prejudice, finds that said motion is well taken and should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that any and all claims of the Plaintiff, brought, or
which could have been brought, against the Defendants, A & S Transportation, Inc., and Jose Tohan, a/k/a Jose J.
Toban Hernandez, in the above-referenced matter shall be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice with each party
to bear their own costs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the terms and conditions of any and all releases
and/or settlement agreements signed by the Plaintiff are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein
and the Court acknowledges that this judgment of dismissal is being entered as a condition of the settlement between
the parties and, in addition, approves the settlement of same and the Court retains jurisdiction over the enforcement,
if any, of the settlement agreement.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED on this the 5th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?