Lenoir v. SGS North America, Inc.

Filing 46

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 9/18/2017. (dbm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION LEUNDRELL LENOIR PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-58-SA-DAS SGS NORTH AMERICA, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Leundrell Lenoir filed his Complaint [1] in this Court on April 13, 20161 alleging that his former employer, SGS North America, Inc., racially discriminated against him in his employment and violated his rights protected by the Family Medical Leave Act.2 Now before the Court is SGS’s Motion for Summary Judgment [40] on all of Lenoir’s claims. For all of the reasons fully explained in a separate memorandum opinion issued this same day, the Defendant, SGS’s Motion for Summary Judgment [40] is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. Plaintiff Lenoir’s Americans with Disabilities Act claim is WITHDRAWN. Defendant SGS’s Motion for Summary Judgment [40] as to Plaintiff Lenoir’s claim for raceharassment based on quid-pro-quo is GRANTED, and this claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendant SGS’s Motions for Summary Judgment [40] as to all of Plaintiff Lenoir’s other claims is DENIED. So ORDERED on this the 18th day of September, 2017. /s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Lenoir filed an Amended Complaint [23] on November 8, 2016. The Plaintiff originally alleged an additional claim for disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Plaintiff withdrew this claim in his summary judgment brief. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?