Duck v. Carthage Ambulance Service, Inc. et al
Filing
50
AGREED ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS as to Roger Stevenson. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/24/2017. (adm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
VAN S. DUCK, Individually and on behalf
of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of
GUSSIE DUCK DECEASED
VERSUS
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO: 1:16-CV-135-SA-DAS
CARTHAGE AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC.,
TIMOTHY BLACKWELL, RODNEY
WOODSON, ROGER STEVENSON and
JOHN DOES 1-10
DEFENDANTS
ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AND COMPLAINT
BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT
The Court has been advised by counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the
defendant, Roger Stevenson (“Stevenson”), that the claims and complaint of the plaintiff,
Van S. Duck and all wrongful death beneficiaries of Gussie Duck, deceased, against
Stevenson have been settled, pending determination of heirship and final consummation
of the settlement. Therefore, it is not necessary that the complaint against Stevenson
remain on the docket of the Court or that Stevenson be required to participate in ongoing
litigation activity involving the remaining claims against the other defendants.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that the claims and complaint of the plaintiff
against Roger Stevenson are dismissed without prejudice, pending consummation of the
settlement and entry of a final judgment of dismissal with prejudice. The Court retains
complete jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen the action upon cause shown that
settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary.
SO ORDERED, this the 24th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
APPROVED:
/s/
HIAWATHA NORTHINGTON, II
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/
RONALD L. ROBERTS
Attorney for Defendant,
Roger Stevenson
duck v. carthage abulance 116cv135 dism stevenson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?