Lyons v. Fisher et al
Certificate of Appealability Denied. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 8/4/17. (rel)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
DAVID EARL LYONS
MARSHALL FISHER, ET AL.
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
A final order having been issued in either a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention
complained of arises out of process issued by a state court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or § 2241 or in a
proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the Court, considering the record in the case and the requirements
of Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), hereby finds that
The applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
A certificate of appealability should not issue.
REASONS FOR DENIAL:
For the reasons stated in the opinion, the court finds that the Petitioner has failed to
Ademonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve issues in
a different manner; or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.@
Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4, 103 S.Ct. 3383, 3394 n.4, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1993)
(superceded by statute) (citations and quotations omitted); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(1) and (2). Specifically,
the court finds, for the reasons set forth in its, memorandum opinion and final judgment, that the
instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.
PART B (if applicable)
The party appealing is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.
The party appealing is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.
REASONS FOR DENIAL:
The Court finds that the Petitioner's appeal is not taken in good faith because it is frivolous and
has no possibility of success. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.
SO ORDERED, this, the 4th day of August, 2017.
/s/ Sharion Aycock__________
U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?