Durham v. Berryhill

Filing 21

ORDER granting 19 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 2/28/18. (ncb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION MARION JUNE DURHAM V. PLAINTIFF NO. 1:17CV00018-JMV NANCY BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT ORDER ON PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES Before the court are Plaintiff’s motion [19] for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Defendant’s response [20]. For the reasons set out below, the motion will be granted. In these proceedings Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying a claim for benefits. By Final Judgment [17] dated December 5, 2017, this court remanded this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Plaintiff now seeks attorney fees in the amount of $6,058.47 for 31.25 hours of attorney time before this court and reimbursement for the $400.00 filing fee on the grounds that she was the prevailing party and the Commissioner’s position was not “substantially justified.” The Acting Commissioner indicates she has no objection to Plaintiff’s motion but, nevertheless, points out that any award should be made payable to Plaintiff, and the filing fee should be delineated as costs. The court, having thoroughly considered the motion, the response, and the applicable law, finds the requested award is reasonable, and no special circumstance would make the award unjust. The court further finds the filing fee should be reimbursed as costs, and the total award should be made payable directly to Plaintiff. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: That the Acting Commissioner shall promptly pay to Plaintiff a total of $6,458.47 in attorney fees and costs for the benefit of counsel for Plaintiff. This 28th day of February, 2018. /s/ Jane M. Virden U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?