Roop v. Itawamba County et al

Filing 22

PROCESS ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 6/23/17. (rel)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
MILFORD LEE ROOP

PLAINTIFF

v.

No. 1:17cv24-NBB-JMV

ITAWAMBA COUNTY, et al

DEFENDANTS

PROCESS ORDER
The court finds that process should issue for defendants: Itawamba County and Chris
Dickerson.
It is ORDERED:
(1)

The clerk of the court will issue process for Itawamba County and Chris Dickerson,

along with a copy of this order and the order permitting the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis.
The United States Marshal Service will serve process upon this defendant under to 28 U.S.C. '
1915(d), using good faith efforts to identify and locate the proper person and obtain service by all
approved alternative means as provided by F.R.Civ.P. 4 and Miss.R.Civ.P. 4 if service by mail is
unsuccessful. If the defendant is located in another state, the Marshal Service must obtain service
by that state’s law governing service of process.
(2)

A scheduling order will be issued once the defendants have answered; the plaintiff

may not submit any discovery requests until the scheduling order has been entered.
(3)

In the event any damages or other moneys become payable to or for the benefit of

the plaintiff as a result of this litigation, whether by way of satisfaction of a judgment, compromise
settlement, or otherwise, the plaintiff remains liable to the United States for the reimbursement of
all court costs, fees and expenses which he has caused to be incurred in the course of this litigation,
and the United States will have a lien against any damages or other moneys until the United States

has been fully reimbursed for those court costs, fees and expenses by payment of them into the
court.
(4)

The plaintiff must acknowledge receipt of this order by signing the enclosed

acknowledgment form and returning it to the court within fourteen (14) days of this date.
(5)

The plaintiff=s failure to keep the court informed of his current address or to comply

with the requirements of this order may lead to dismissal of his lawsuit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b),
for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court.
SO ORDERED, this, the 23rd day of June, 2017.

s/Jane M. Virden
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE