Roop v. Itawamba County et al
Filing
33
ORDER dismissing 16 Motion for Release from Prison for Release; dismissing 18 Motion for Release; dismissing 24 Motion for immediate release; directing Clerk to provide plaintiff with a proper 2254 form and IFP form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 9/11/17. (jla) Modified on 9/11/2017 (jla).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
MILFORD LEE ROOP
PLAINTIFF
v.
No. 1:17CV24-NBB-JMV
ITAWAMBA COUNTY
CHRIS DICKINSON
ITAWAMBA COUNTY JAIL JAILERS
DEFENDANTS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO
OPEN A HABEAS CORPUS CASE WITH
DOCUMENTS [16], [18] [24]
This matter comes before the court on the motions [16], [18], [24] by Milford Lee Roop, who
challenges the conditions of his confinement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In three motions [16], [18], [24],
he alleges various violations to his civil rights as a prisoner, as well as irregularities regarding his
prosecution and requests for parole – and seeks immediate release from incarceration and damages
against the various defendants. As this case contains elements of both a prisoner civil rights suit under
42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the court will permit it to
proceed – as separate suits – in both ways. As such, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to open a
separate case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the court’s docket using motions [16], [18], and [24] in the
instant case. In addition, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide the plaintiff with the proper
form for initiating a petition under § 2254, as well as a form for proceeding in forma pauperis in the
new case. The instant motions [16], [18], and [24] are thus DISMISSED in the instant case. The
plaintiff must return a completed copy of those forms within 30 days from the date of this order.
SO ORDERED, this, the 11th day of September, 2017.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?