Jackson v. Berryhill
Filing
19
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Angela Hollingshed Jackson against Nancy A. Berryhill. The case is REMANDED for further proceedings. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 4/27/18. (ncb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
ANGELA HOLLINGSHED JACKSON
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO. 1:17CV00053-JMV
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
DEFENDANT
FINAL JUDGMENT
This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an
unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying a
claim for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income
for the period from August 26, 2013, through December 21, 2015. The parties have consented
to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28
U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The court, having
reviewed the administrative record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and having
heard oral argument, finds as follows:
Consistent with the court’s ruling from the bench during a hearing held April 26, 2018,
the ALJ’s assignment of “little weight” to the medical source opinions of Dr. Nathalie Lara (not
including Dr. Lara’s opinion that “[i]t is unlikely [the claimant] would be able to engage in
gainful employment”) is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. As pointed out
during the hearing, the ALJ’s decision contains inaccurate recitations of Dr. Lara’s opinions, fails
to acknowledge certain opinions, and ignores supporting evidence from Dr. Lara’s treatment
records.
On remand, the ALJ must recontact Dr. Lara for clarification regarding any of her
medical source opinions, if necessary, and request a comprehensive assessment, function-byfunction, of the claimant’s ability to perform mental work activity based upon her treatment of
the claimant for the relevant period. If the ALJ is unable to obtain a function-by-function
assessment of the claimant’s mental RFC from Dr. Lara after reasonable efforts, the ALJ must
consult a medical advisor who must review the entirety of the medical evidence of record and
provide an assessment of the claimant’s mental RFC for the relevant period. The ALJ must
consider the additional evidence along with all of the evidence in the file. And, if necessary, the
ALJ must obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony. Ultimately, the ALJ may conduct
any additional proceedings that are not inconsistent with this order and must render a new
decision for the period from August 26, 2013, through December 21, 2015.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is REVERSED
and REMANDED for further proceedings.
This, the 27th day of April, 2018.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?