Robinson v. City of Tupelo, Mississippi et al
Filing
65
ORDER TERMINATING MOTION. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/6/2018. (adm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
CAMERON ROBINSON
PLAINTIFF
V.
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:17-cv-55-SA-DAS
CITY OF TUPELO, MISSISSIPPI,
LEE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI,
OFFICER KAITLYN WEEKS, in her individual capacity, and
CAPTAIN TIM BELL, in his individual and official capacities for
injunctive and declaratory relief only
DEFENDANTS
ORDER TERMINATING MOTION
Plaintiff filed suit on April 12, 2017 asserting that he was arrested without probable cause
and that the policies of the City of Tupelo had contributed to his arrest. Days after the case
management conference, Defendant Weeks moved for summary judgment, asserting that she was
entitled to qualified immunity.
After briefing was completed, Plaintiff moved the Court to amend his Complaint,
alleging additional legal theories to support his claims against Defendant Weeks. The Court
granted leave to amend, and Plaintiff added claims and legal theories under the Fourth and First
Amendment. Therefore, given the additional claims against Defendant Weeks that were not fully
briefed in the Parties’ filings, the Court terminates Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
[20] without prejudice.
Defendant Weeks is given two weeks within which to file a Motion for Summary
Judgment addressing Plaintiff’s claims and legal theories as alleged by the Amended Complaint
or refile the original Motion for Summary Judgment as it sees appropriate.
SO ORDERED this the 6th day of February, 2018.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?