Rupert v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. This CASE is CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/9/2018. (dbm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
HENRY W. RUPERT, JR.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-90-SA-DAS
U.S. BANK, N.A.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Henry Rupert originally filed his Complaint  in the Chancery Court of Lee County
Mississippi. U.S. Bank, N.A. removed the case to this Court on June 13, 2017 premising federal
jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship. Now before the Court is U.S. Bank’s Motion to Dismiss
 the Plaintiff’s complaint for failing to state a claim. Finding the pro se Plaintiff’s Complaint
unclear and lacking factual information, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause  granting
the Plaintiff additional time to amend his pleadings and attempt to cure the deficiencies. The
Plaintiff did not respond in the time allotted.1
As previously noted, none of the Plaintiff’s pleadings contain specific, coherent, factual
allegations involving U.S. Bank, and the Court is unable to ascertain the underlying facts or the
nature of the Plaintiff’s claims. For these reasons, the Court finds that dismissal is warranted under
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted, and 41(b) for failing to prosecute this case and failing to comply with this Court’s orders.
Defendant U.S. Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss  is GRANTED, and this CASE is
DISMISSED with prejudice. This CASE is CLOSED.
So ORDERED on this the 9th day of March, 2018.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
The Court’s mail correspondence to the Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?