Britt v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al

Filing 322

ORDER granting 294 Motion in Limine; granting 296 Motion in Limine; granting 300 Motion in Limine; granting 302 Motion in Limine. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 9/22/2021. (llw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION MEGAN BRITT V. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17CV219-NBB-DAS MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER Presently before the court are the joint motions in limine filed by the defendants Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company. The defendants move in limine as follows: (1) to prohibit evidence regarding allegations of mistreatment or harassment of other female agents and staff in the Lowndes County Farm Bureau office; (2) to prohibit evidence regarding allegations of mistreatment or harassment of the plaintiff by the now-dismissed defendant Roy Weathers; (3) to prohibit evidence regarding punitive damages during the liability and compensatory damages phase of the trial; and (4) to prohibit evidence regarding other lawsuits involving the defendants. The plaintiff filed no responses or objections to any of the aforementioned motions in limine, and the motions will be granted as unopposed. The court notes that it will also grant the defendants’ request that the trial of this cause be bifurcated into a liability and compensatory damages phase and a punitive damages phase, if the latter is required at the conclusion of the first phase. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendants’ motions in limine are GRANTED. This 22nd day of September, 2021. /s/ Neal Biggers NEAL B. BIGGERS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?