Britt v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al

Filing 351

ORDER granting 323 Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal; denying 323 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 325 Motion for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal; denying 325 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 345 Joint Motion to Continue. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 1/14/2022. (llw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION MEGAN BRITT V. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17CV219-NBB-DAS MISSISSIPPI FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANTS ORDER This cause comes before the court upon the defendants’ motions for reconsideration or, alternatively, for certification of interlocutory appeal and the parties’ joint motion for a continuance. Upon due consideration, the court finds as follows: The court declines to reconsider, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), its September 22, 2021 ruling denying the defendants’ motions for summary judgment but will certify said order for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the court finding that controlling questions of law are involved; the questions presented are those where there is substantial ground for difference of opinion; and an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Further, the parties’ joint motion for continuance of the trial and pretrial conference should be granted for the grounds stated therein and to allow time for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to rule on the interlocutory appeal. It is, therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendants’ motions for reconsideration are DENIED; the motions for certification of interlocutory appeal are GRANTED; and the joint motion for continuance is GRANTED. This 14th day of January, 2022. /s/ Neal Biggers NEAL B. BIGGERS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?