Thompson v. Lee County et al

Filing 89

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 86 Motion for Reconsideration re 53 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel in case 1:20-cv-00140-NBB-JMV; DENYING Plaintiff's 53 Motion for Reconsideration re 17 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel in case 1:20-cv-00215-GHD-RP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/18/21. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00140-NBB-JMV, 1:20-cv-00215-GHD-RP (cb)

Case: 1:20-cv-00140-NBB-JMV Doc #: 89 Filed: 11/18/21 1 of 1 PageID #: 751

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
BOBBY SENORIS THOMPSON

PLAINTIFF

v.

No. 1:20CV140-NBB-JMV

LEE COUNTY, ET AL.

DEFENDANTS
Consolidated With

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
BOBBY SENORIS THOMPSON

PLAINTIFF

v.

No. 1:20CV215-NBB-JMV

LEE COUNTY

DEFENDANTS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION [86 in lead case], [53 in companion case]
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE DENIAL [53 in lead case], [17 in companion case]
OF APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the
court’s order denying appointment of counsel. Interlocutory orders, such as the present one, are
subject to the complete power of the court rendering them to afford such relief from them as
justice requires. 7 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 60.20 at 60–170 (2d ed. 1985). In this instance,
the plaintiff’s arguments are insufficient to persuade the court to alter its initial ruling. As such,
the plaintiff’s request [86 in lead case], [53 in companion case]for reconsideration is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this, the 18th day of November, 2021.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE