Burrage v. Lee County Adult Jail

Filing 75

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 50 Motion for Judgment in his Favor based on the Defendants' Alleged Failure to Provide Photographs, Videos, and other Documents in case 1:20-cv-00222-NBB-RP; DENYING (40) Motion for Judgment in his Favor based on the Defendants' Alleged Failure to Provide Photographs, Videos, and other Documents in case 1:21-cv-00103-NBB-RP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/9/22. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00222-NBB-RP, 1:21-cv-00103-NBB-RP (cb)

Download PDF
Case: 1:20-cv-00222-NBB-RP Doc #: 75 Filed: 05/09/22 1 of 1 PageID #: 304 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION JAMEY PAUL BURRAGE PLAINTIFF v. No. 1:20CV222-NBB-RP LEE COUNTY ADULT JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT DEFENDANT Consolidated With IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION JAMEY PAUL BURRAGE PLAINTIFF v. No. 1:21CV103-NBB-RP LEE COUNTY ADULT JAIL, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN HIS FAVOR BASED ON THE DEFENDANTS’ALLEGED FAILURE TO PROVIDE PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff’s motion [50 in Lead Case, 40 in Member Case] for the court to enter judgment in his favor because the defendants allegedly failed to provide him relevant discovery in accordance with the court’s scheduling order. The defendants have responded to the motion, noting that they have responded to the court’s scheduling order by producing 236 pages of documents. As the defendants have averred that they have produced the available documents described in the scheduling order, the instant motion [50 in Lead Case, 40 in Member Case] is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this, the 9th day of May, 2022. /s/ Roy Percy UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?