Burrage v. Lee County Adult Jail
Filing
75
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 50 Motion for Judgment in his Favor based on the Defendants' Alleged Failure to Provide Photographs, Videos, and other Documents in case 1:20-cv-00222-NBB-RP; DENYING (40) Motion for Judgment in his Favor based on the Defendants' Alleged Failure to Provide Photographs, Videos, and other Documents in case 1:21-cv-00103-NBB-RP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 5/9/22. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-00222-NBB-RP, 1:21-cv-00103-NBB-RP (cb)
Case: 1:20-cv-00222-NBB-RP Doc #: 75 Filed: 05/09/22 1 of 1 PageID #: 304
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
JAMEY PAUL BURRAGE
PLAINTIFF
v.
No. 1:20CV222-NBB-RP
LEE COUNTY ADULT JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
DEFENDANT
Consolidated With
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ABERDEEN DIVISION
JAMEY PAUL BURRAGE
PLAINTIFF
v.
No. 1:21CV103-NBB-RP
LEE COUNTY ADULT JAIL, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
IN HIS FAVOR BASED ON THE DEFENDANTS’ALLEGED FAILURE
TO PROVIDE PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff’s motion [50 in Lead Case, 40 in Member
Case] for the court to enter judgment in his favor because the defendants allegedly failed to provide
him relevant discovery in accordance with the court’s scheduling order. The defendants have
responded to the motion, noting that they have responded to the court’s scheduling order by producing
236 pages of documents. As the defendants have averred that they have produced the available
documents described in the scheduling order, the instant motion [50 in Lead Case, 40 in Member
Case] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this, the 9th day of May, 2022.
/s/ Roy Percy
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?