Meeks v. Cunningham

Filing 26

ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/16/21. (jla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION LISA RENEE MEEKS PLAINTIFF V. NO. 1:20-CV-235-DMB-DAS DAVID CUNNINGHAM, JR. DEFENDANT ORDER On July 13, 2021, David Cunningham, Jr., filed a motion asking that the Court “enter an Order of Dismissal with prejudice as to the claims asserted by Lisa Renee Meeks against [him] only.” Doc. #25 at ¶ 7. Cunningham represents that the parties reached a settlement agreement with regard to Meeks’ claims against him but, because his counterclaim against Meeks was not settled, “the parties are asking for those claims to remain open and pending within this cause of action.” Id. at ¶¶ 5, 6. According to Cunningham, Meeks does not oppose the motion. Id. at ¶ 8. In light of the parties’ settlement of Meeks’ claims against Cunningham and the fact that Meeks does not oppose the dismissal of such claims, the motion to dismiss [25] is GRANTED. Meeks’ claims against Cunningham are DISMISSED with prejudice. Cunningham’s counterclaim against Meeks remains. SO ORDERED, this 16th day of July, 2021. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?