Whitehead v. Mesilla Valley Transportation

Filing 86

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 82 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 4/22/2014. (llw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
DELTA DIVISION
L.V. WHITEHEAD

PLAINTIFF

V.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV106-B-A

MESILLA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION

DEFENDANT

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Presently before the court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
dated October 4, 2013. The plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation,
and the defendant has responded.
The court finds that the plaintiff has made no specific objection to the Magistrate’s
Report and Recommendation and has cited no authority in support of his position. For the most
part, the plaintiff simply expresses general dissatisfaction with his attorney. The plaintiff’s
objection therefore does not comport with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and is
without merit.
It is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
That the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated October 4,
2013, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court, and the proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law therein set out are adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of
the court.
This, the 22nd day of April, 2014.

/s/ Neal Biggers
NEAL B. BIGGERS, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE