Grosch v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
ORDER in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion denying 139 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 139 Motion for New Trial. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 1/22/2009. (pbs, USDC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION ADAM GROSCH, VS. PLAINTIFF, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV204-P-A
TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI; TUNICA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF DORNAE MOSBY; and HWCC-TUNICA, INC.; ORDER
In accordance with a Memorandum Opinion issued this day, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that HWCC-Tunica, Inc.'s renewed motion for a judgment as a matter of law, or alternatively, motion for new trial, or alternatively, motion for remittitur  are DENIED. SO ORDERED this the 22nd day of January, A.D., 2008.
/s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr. W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?