Gonzalez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al

Filing 59

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 56 ;DENYING 55 ; DISMISSING 49 ; DENYING 49 ; REQUIRING THE PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NAMING EACH DEFENDANT AND CLEARLY STATING THE ACTIONS OR OMISSIONS GIVING RISE TO THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 3/30/10. (cr, USDC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION OSVALDO R. GONZALEZ v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ET AL. PLAINTIFF No. 2:08CV89-P-S DEFENDANTS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [56] FOR VERIFICATION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [55] TO APPOINT EXPERT, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [49] TO CORRECT ORDER; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [49] FOR A COPY OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING; REQUIRING THE PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NAMING EACH DEFENDANT AND CLEARLY STATING THE ACTIONS OR OMISSIONS GIVING RISE TO THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST EACH DEFENDANT This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff's motion [56] for verification of service of process on the defendants in this case. That motion is DENIED. The court will require the plaintiff to file and amended complaint as set forth below. Once the plaintiff has filed his amended complaint, the court will issue process for each defendant who has not been served. The plaintiff also seeks [55] appointment of an expert witness. That motions is also DENIED. Section 28 U.S.C. § 1915 of the United States Code sets forth the items the government may pay for indigent plaintiffs, and expert witnesses are not among those items, which include only: (1) printing the record on appeal if required by the appellate court, (2) providing a transcript of proceedings, and (3) serving process upon the defendants. In addition, the plaintiff has moved [49] to correct the court's February 5, 2010, order such that it lists defendant Robert Adams only once and identifies him as the Warden of the Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility. As Robert Adams is listed as a defendant and correctly identified on the docket as "Warden, Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility," that motion is DISMISSED as unnecessary. The plaintiff also requests [49] a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing of February 20, 2010. That request is DENIED for the present, as the record of the hearing has not yet been transcribed. Should the plaintiff require the transcript in preparation for a trial of this matter or for an appeal, he may request a transcript at that time. Finally, the plaintiff has filed an original complaint, and amended complaint, a second amended complaint, and various briefs in support of his multiple complaints. In addition, it appears that some of the plaintiff's claims are contained in his motion for a preliminary injunction ­ and that the plaintiff's request of October 23, 2009, to amend his complaint included a request that the court insert and remove words from paragraphs in a previous complaint. In sum, the plaintiff's claims can no longer be found in a single document ­ and do not meet the requirement of FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(2) that "[a] pleading that states a claim for relief must contain . . . a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief . . . ." The plaintiff's "pleading" is now scattered so far throughout the docket that the court can no longer determine what the plaintiff's claims are ­ or the actions each defendant has taken entitling the plaintiff to relief. For these reasons, the plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint within twentyone days of the date of this order. The amended complaint must include the name and title of each defendant, the actions or omissions of each defendant entitling the plaintiff to relief, and the relief sought for each claim. This amended complaint will supersede all previous complaints ­ and put all of the plaintiff's claims before the court in a single document. 2 SO ORDERED, this the 30th day of March, 2010. /s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr. W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?