Pamperin, Inc. v. Plass et al

Filing 59

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion to Compel. Signed by David A. Sanders on 2/15/2010. (sef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION PAMPERIN, INC. d/b/a LEAF ELIMINATOR COMPANY VS. PATRICK PLASS and wife, LILA PLASS, Individually and d/b/a PLP PRODUCTS, PLASS PROPERTIES, L.L.C., and CONVERTA KILN, INC. ORDER PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-35-B-A DEFENDANTS This case comes before the court pursuant to Rule 16.1(b)(3)(B) of the Uniform Local Rules for the Northern and Southern Districts of Mississippi. The rule provides that Filing an immunity defense or jurisdictional defense motion stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not related to the issue pending the court's ruling on the motion, including any appeal. The plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and lack of venue [Doc. #35] on August 28, 2009. Accordingly, the present action is stayed as to all defendants except Patrick Plass, individually. Additionally, with respect to plaintiffs' motion to compel [Doc. #52] the motion is granted in part and denied in part as ordered from the bench in the hearing held on February 10, 2010. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: Except as to defendant Patrick Plass, individually, discovery not related to the pending jurisdictional issue is hereby stayed; and, Plaintiff's motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part; and, Parties are to bear their own costs. SO ORDERED, this the 15th day of February 2010. /s/ David A. Sanders UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?