Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
JUDGMENT in favor of Felicia A. Walters against Commissioner of Social Security. The case is REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER for further proceedings. CASE CLOSED. Signed by David A. Sanders on 3/30/11. (ncb)
Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
Doc. 20
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION
FELICIA A. WALTERS VS. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY FINAL JUDGMENT
PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10CV00065-DAS DEFENDANT
Following oral argument during a hearing held before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge on March 29, 2011, the court determined that the ALJ's decision is not supported by substantial evidence. Specifically, the ALJ's decision failed to provide an adequate explanation of why the claimant's condition does not meet or equal Listing 11.02 or 11.03. While there is no dispute that the claimant does not suffer from epilepsy, the court is concerned that the previous ALJ' treatment of her pseudoseizure diagnosis may not have been thorough s enough. See Boiles v. Barnhart, 395 F.3d 421 (7th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, on remand the Commissioner shall assign the case to a new ALJ. The new ALJ shall reconsider all of the medical evidence and make specific findings regarding whether the claimant's condition meets or equals either Listing 11.02 or 11.03. The ALJ may conduct any further proceedings not inconsistent with this order. The parties, having consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: That this case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings as set
Dockets.Justia.com
out above. THIS, 30th day of March, 2011.
/s/ David A. Sanders U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?