The City of Clarksdale, Mississippi v. Massey et al

Filing 37

ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by David A. Sanders on 6/3/2010. (sef, USDC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION THE CITY OF CLARKSDALE, MISSISSIPPI, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE CLARKSDALE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:10CV00068-MPM-DAS EVELYN L. MASSEY; JOSEPH P. SHERMAN and Wife AGNES N. SHERMAN; JIMMY RICHARDSON; MELISSA KING; ALBERT GRATTAFIORI and Wife EVA GRATTAFIORI; JAMES NORVELL GOODEN and ATHSICIA BURREL HARRY; BILLY W. LUTTS and Wife JENNIFER LUTTS; CHARLES GOON; VERNON T. DAVIS And Wife EVA CATHERINE DAVIS; KEITH A. WILSON, THEODORE STRONG, SR., and ANGELA R. STRONG; DOROTHY H. MACK; MICHAEL A. PITTMAN and Wife SHIRLEY W. PITTMAN; TARMISHA L. HILL and DELVIN HILL, SR.; and MOLLY TOLAR FRANKS DEFENDANTS JOHN E. CHRESTMAN And Wife BARBARA L. CHRESTMAN; ANGELO J. BALDUCCI, JR., and Wife JACKIE A. BALDUCCI; GEORGE PATRICK DAVIS and Wife LIDA M. DAVIS; DOROTHY H. MACK; AND CHARLES GOON DEFENDANTS/CROSS-CLAIMANTS ORDER GRANTING STAY The Court being advised finds: 1. The above referenced Cause was removed to the United States District Court. 2. The separate Mississippi Defendants and the Plaintiff have filed a Motion to Remand. Page 1 of 1 3. Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(1)(B), the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all other discovery not relevant to remand shall be stayed. IT IS ORDERED: The attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to remand are stayed pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B). The parties shall promptly notify the undersigned Magistrate Judge of any Order denying the Motion to Remand and submit an Order Lifting the Stay. SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of June, 2010. /s/David A. Sanders HONORABLE DAVID A. SANDERS MAGISTRATE JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?