Nodarse v. Rose et al

Filing 75

ORDER denying 71 Motion ; denying 72 Motion ; finding as moot 73 Motion ; finding as moot 74 Motion. Signed by Jane M Virden on 6/26/2012. (sef)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
DELTA DIVISION

ALEXANDER NODARSE

PLAINTIFF

V.

NO: 2:10CV143-D-S

MS. ROSE, CORRECTIONAL COUNSELOR, ET AL.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Before the court are plaintiff’s pro se motions for judgment on numerous motions,
objections and appeals filed with this court (#’s 71, 72, 73, 74). In an order dated June 21, 2012,
the court denied plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration and for counsel, thereby making
plaintiff’s motions for judgment on those issues moot. They are therefore DENIED. Plaintiff’s
objection likewise has been addressed and is DENIED as a successive pleading. Finally, plaintiff
requests a judgment on his appeal that is pending. His appeal is currently before the court of
appeals and any motion for a judgment on his appeal is improperly before this court and,
therefore, is hereby DENIED.
SO ORDERED this 26th day of June, 2012.

/s/ Jane M. Virden
U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE